PL EN
 
2023 vol. 77
CC BY-SA 4.0
Get citation
Hydrocephalus – a typical radiological symptom?
Marta Marek 1
,
 
Agata Aleksandra Macionga 2
,
 
Kinga Szopińska 2
,
 
Ewa Kluczewska 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Katedra i Zakład Radiologii Lekarskiej i Radiodiagnostyki, Wydział Nauk Medycznych w Zabrzu, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach, Polska / Department of Radiology and Radiodiagnostics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
 
2
Studenckie Koło Naukowe przy Katedrze i Zakładzie Radiologii Lekarskiej i Radiodiagnostyki, Wydział Nauk Medycznych w Zabrzu, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach, Polska / Students’ Scientific Club, Department of Radiology and Radiodiagnostics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Marta Marek   

Katedra i Zakład Radiologii Lekarskiej i Radiodiagnostyki, Wydział Nauk Medycznych w Zabrzu, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach, ul. 3 Maja 13, 41-800 Zabrze
 
 
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2023;77:25-29
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18794/aams/155107
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (15)
 
KEYWORDS
hydrocephalus
cerebrospinal fluid
radiological image
 
TOPICS
Radiology and Radiodiagnistics
 
ABSTRACT
Hydrocephalus can have many causes. The task of a radiologist in addition to find out about enlargement of the ventricular system by using diagnostic imaging methods is also to attempt to determine the cause of such a condition. The authors would like to present the subject of the formation of and issues related to the disturbance of cerebrospinal fluid circulation. The aim of the study was also to present the current classification of hydrocephalus in order to facilitate communication between physicians – the radiologist and neurologist. It is important to draw the attention of radiologists to the fact that hydrocephalus is not only a radiological symptom, but may also be associated with disturbances in the clinical picture of patients affected by hydrocephalus.
 
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Shapey J., Toma A., Saeed S.R. Physiology of cerebrospinal fluid circulation. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019; 27(5): 326–333, doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000576.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Filis A.K., Aghayev K., Vrionis F.D. Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus: physiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Cancer Control 2017; 24(1): 6–8, doi: 10.1177/107327481702400102.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Sakka L., Coll G., Chazal J. Anatomy and physiology of cerebrospinal fluid. Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 2011; 128(6): 309–316, doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2011.03.002.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Graff-Radford N.R., Jones D.T. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Continuum (Minneap. Minn.) 2019; 25(1): 165–186, doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000689.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Algin O., Hakyemez B., Parlak M. The efficiency of PC-MRI in diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and prediction of shunt response. Acad. Radiol. 2010; 17(2): 181–187, doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.011.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Langner S., Fleck S., Baldauf J., Mensel B., Kühn J.P., Kirsch M. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of hydrocephalus in adults. Rofo 2017; 189(8): 728–739, doi: 10.1055/s-0043-108550.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Jiang Q. MRI and glymphatic system. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2019; 4(2): 75–77, doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000197.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Mestre H., Mori Y., Nedergaard M. The brain’s glymphatic system: current controversies. Trends Neurosci. 2020; 43(7): 458–466, doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.04.003.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Kahle K.T., Kulkarni A.V., Limbrick D.D. Jr, Warf B.C. Hydrocephalus in children. Lancet 2016; 387(10020): 788–799, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60694-8.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Tully H.M., Dobyns W.B. Infantile hydrocephalus: a review of epidemiology, classification and causes. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2014; 57(8): 359–368, doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.06.002.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Agarwal A., Bathla G., Kanekar S. Imaging of communicating hydrocephalus. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR 2016; 37(2): 100–108, doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2016.02.007.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Wang K.W., Chang W.N., Chang H.W., Wang H.C., Lu C.H. Clinical relevance of hydrocephalus in bacterial meningitis in adults. Surg. Neurol. 2005; 64(1): 61–65, discussion 66, doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.10.009.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Wright Z., Larrew T.W., Eskandari R. Pediatric hydrocephalus: current state of diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr. Rev. 2016; 37(11): 478–490, doi: 10.1542/pir.2015-0134.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
M. Das J., Biagioni M.C. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. [Updated 2022 Jun 27]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Gavrilov G.V., Gaydar B.V., Svistov D.V., Korovin A.E., Samarcev I.N., Churilov L.P., Tovpeko D.V. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (Hakim-Adams syndrome): clinical symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Psychiatr. Danub. 2019; 31(Suppl 5): 737–744.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1734-025X
Journals System - logo


© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top