Current issue
About the Journal
Scientific Council
Editorial Board
Regulatory and archival policy
Code of publishing ethics
Publisher
Information about the processing of personal data in relation to cookies and newsletter subscription
Archive
For Authors
For Reviewers
Contact
Reviewers
Annals reviewers in 2022
Annals reviewers in 2021
Annals reviewers in 2020
Annals reviewers in 2019
Annals reviewers in 2018
Annals reviewers in 2017
Annals reviewers in 2016
Annals reviewers in 2015
Annals reviewers in 2014
Annals reviewers in 2013
Annals reviewers in 2012
Links
Sklep Wydawnictwa SUM
Biblioteka Główna SUM
Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
Privacy policy
Accessibility statement
Hydronephrosis or megacalycosis – differential diagnosis of urinary tract obstruction
| 1 | Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Warsaw |
| 2 | Studenckie Koło Naukowe, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Warsaw |
| 3 | Department of Pediatric Urology, Medical University of Warsaw |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Agnieszka Szmigielska
Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki Wigury 63 a, 02-091 Warszawa
Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki Wigury 63 a, 02-091 Warszawa
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2017;71:62–65
KEYWORDS
megacalycosishydronephrosisurinary tract infectionvoiding cystourethrographylower-dose computed tomography urography
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Dilatation of the collecting system requires differential diagnosis. Megacalycosis should be consi-dered in the differential diagnosis of congenital hydronephrosis. Congenital megacalycosis is a rare condition con-sisting of caliceal dilatation without ureteral obstruction. The abnormality is usually unilateral and kidney function is normal.
CASE PRESENTATION: We report a male patient with urinary tract infection and dilatation of collecting system in the left kidney detected in ultrasound. Voiding cystourethrography ruled out vesicoureteral reflux. Dynamic renal scintigraphy showed hydronephrosis. Megacalycosis was suggested by lower-dose computed tomography urography.
CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of megacalycosis prevented unnecessary diagnostic procedures and treatment.
REFERENCES (7)
2.
Kalaitzis C., Patris E., Deligeorgiou E., Sountoulides P., Bantis A., Giannakopoulos S., Touloupidis S. Radiological findings and the clinical importance of megacalycosis. Res. Rep. Urol. 2015; 7: 153–155.
4.
Kasap B., Kavukeu S., Soylu A., Turkmen M., Cecil M. Megacalycosis: report of two cases. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2005; 20(6): 828–830.
5.
Minn D., Christmann D., De Saint-Martin A., Alembik Y., Eliot M., Mack G., Fischbach M., Flament J., Veillon F., Dollfus H. Further clinical and sensorial delineation of Schnitzel-Gliedion syndrome: report of two cases. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2002; 109(3): 211–217.
6.
Young Hun Choi, Jung-Eun Cheon, Woo Sun Kim, In-One Kim. Ultrasonography of hydronephrosis in the newborn: a practical review. Ultrasonography. 2016; 35(3): 198–211.
7.
Pieretti-Vanmercke R., Pieretti A., Pieretti R.V. Megacalycosis: a rare condition. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2009; 24(5): 1077–1079.
The Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, as the Operator of the annales.sum.edu.pl website, processes personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about Users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms, saving cookies in end devices, as well as by collecting web server logs, which are in the possession of the website Operator. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services in accordance with the Privacy policy.
You can consent to the processing of data for these purposes, refuse consent or access more detailed information.
You can consent to the processing of data for these purposes, refuse consent or access more detailed information.