Gait analysis in children after the lengthening of the lower limb by the Ilizarov technique
 
More details
Hide details
1
Zakład Fizjoterapii Katedry Fizjoterapii, Wydział Nauk o Zdrowiu w Katowicach, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
 
2
Zakład Kinezjologii Katedry Fizjoterapii, Wydział Nauk o Zdrowiu w Katowicach, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
 
3
Katedra Ortopedii i Fizjoterapii, Collegium Medicum, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
 
4
Zakład Adaptowanej Aktywności Fizycznej i Sportu Katedry Fizjoterapii, Wydział Nauk o Zdrowiu w Katowicach, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
 
 
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2017;71:252-264
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Distraction osteogenesis for the correction of axial deformities and short lower limbs is a long-term process which adversely affects the functional state of the locomotor system and the child's emotions. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyse the spatiotemporal parameters of gait, and to compare the results of treatment in children after lengthening the tibia or femur by the Ilizarov technique.

Material and methods:
The study was performed in 40 children with lower limb asymmetry treated in the Department of Clinical Orthopaedics in Sosnowiec in 2000–2006. Each child was subjected to osteodistraction treatment using the Ilizarov technique. The subjects were divided into two subgroups: group 1 consisted of 20 children who had Ilizarov tibial lengthening, and group 2 consisted of 20 children who had Ilizarov femoral lengthening. Gait analysis was carried out using a dedicated system from Zebris, in which the patient is expected to walk along an approx. 2-metre long marked trajectory. The treadmill platform responded to the load, which enabled evaluation of the ground reaction force and the spatiotemporal parameters of gait. After completing measurements, the system produced a report with values of the tested parameters.

Results:
The study shows that both in children with a lengthened femur or tibia, three of the five subphases of the stance phase in the operated on limb and unoperated on limb were longer, and two shorter as compared to the normal values reported by J. Perry. The subphases of initial contact, loading response and midstance were longer, while the terminal stance and preswing were shorter.

Conclusions:
In children with a short lower limb treated with the Ilizarov technique, a better outcome was achieved after lengthening the femur compared to the tibia. The gait cycle in children after limb elongation is different from normal.

 
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Wagner H. Operative Beinverlangerung. Chirurg. 1971; 42: 260–266.
 
2.
Wagner H. Operative lengthtening of the femur. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1978; 136: 125–142.
 
3.
Tensiorowski M., Zarzycka M. Podstawowe zasady wydłużania kończyn. Kasper. Kraków 1998.
 
4.
Novikov K.I., Subramanyam K.N., Muradisinov S.O., Novikova O.S., Kolesnikova E.S. Cosmetic lower limb lengthening by Ilizarov apparatus: what are the risks? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014; 472(11): 3549–3556.
 
5.
Hasler C.C., Krieg A.H. Current concepts of leg lengthening. J. Child. Orthop. 2012; 6(2): 89–104.
 
6.
Latash M.L. Fundamentals of motor control. Elsevier 2017.
 
7.
Latash M.L. Biomechanics of motor control. Academic Kress 2015.
 
8.
Wrzosek Z., Konieczny G. Usprawnianie chorych leczonych metodą Ilizarowa z powodu skrótu w obrębie kości udowej. Fizjoterapia 2001; 9(1): 53–55.
 
9.
Pasierbek M., Gazdzik T.S., Ryba J., Barczyński A., Golonka J. Ocena zakresu ruchomości stawu kolanowego w trakcie wydłużania uda metodą Ilizarowa. Ortop. Traum. Rehab. 2002; 4(5): 622–625.
 
10.
Napiontek M. Zasady rehabilitacji chorych leczonych metodą Ilizarowa. Chir. Narz. Ruchu Ortop. Pol. 2000; 65(3): 287–294.
 
11.
Lisiński P., Stryła W. Zasady usprawniania leczniczego w przypadkach wydłużania kończyn dolnych. Ortop. Traum. Rehab. 2002; 4(4): 503–506.
 
12.
Marciniak W. Nierówność kończyn dolnych – etiopatogeneza i następstwa. Chir. Narz. Ruchu Ortop. Pol. 1994; 59(Supl. 1): 1–9.
 
13.
Umer M., Rashid H., Umer H.M., Raza H. Hip reconstruction osteotomy by Ilizarov method as a salvage option for abnormal hip joints. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014: 835681.
 
14.
Gouron R. Surgical technique and indications of the induced membrane procedure in children. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2016; 102(1 Suppl): S133–139.
 
15.
Simpson A.H., Halliday J., Hamilton D.F., Smith M., Mills K. Limb lengthening and peripheral nerve function-factors associated with deterioration of conduction. Acta Orthop. 2013; 84(6): 579–584.
 
16.
Fan J., Zhang X., Liu T., Ling L., Chen T., Jie S. Treatment of external fixator in young patients with valgus deformity of the knee companied with leg shortening. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013; 38(2): 191–195.
 
17.
Fu X., Zhang X., Li Z., Yin M., Wu K. Limping gait improvement by femoral lengthening in ankylotic hips and limb length discrepancy in young adults. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012; 37(5): 491–494.
 
18.
Ilizarov G. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1990; 250: 8–26.
 
19.
Morasiewicz L. Strategia i taktyka postępowania w wydłużaniu kończyn. Ortop. Traum. Rehab. 2002; 4(3): 310–315.
 
20.
Wall A. Leczenie operacyjne nierówności kończyn. Chir. Narz. Ruchu Ortop. Pol. 1994; 59(Supl. 1): 11–18.
 
21.
Wall A., Morasiewicz L., Dragan Sz., Krawczyk A., Uher T. Analiza wskazań i taktyki postępowania leczniczego w operacyjnym leczeniu nierówności kończyn metodą Ilizarowa. Chir. Narz. Ruchu Ortop. Pol. 1994; 59(Supl. 1): 318–322.
 
22.
Siffert R.S. Lower limb length discrepancy. J. Bone Joint. Surg. 1987; 69A(7): 1100–1106.
 
23.
Kawamura B. Limb lengthening by means of subcutaneus osteotomy. J. Bone Joint. Surg. 1968; 50A(5): 851–878.
 
24.
Rozbruch S.R., Paley D., Bhave A., Herzenberg J.E. Ilizarov hip reconstruction for the late sequeiae of infantile hip infection. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2005; 87(5): 1007–1018.
 
25.
Perttunen J.R., Anttila E., Södergård J., Merikanto J., Komi P.V. Effect of intramedullary gradual elongation of shorter limb on gait patterns. Pediatr. Int. 2003; 45(3): 324–332.
 
26.
Wrzosek Z. Nierówna długość kończyny dolnej i jej leczenie metodą osteogenezy dystrakcyjnej – aspekt rehabilitacyjny. Fizjoterapia 2001; 9(1): 49–52.
 
27.
Lai K.A., Lin C.J., Jou I.M., Su F.C. Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty with leg-length equalization in women with unilateral congenital complete dislocation of the hip-comparision with untreated patients. J. Orthop. Res. 2001; 19: 1147–1152.
 
28.
Giannikas K.A., Maganaris C.N., Karski M.T., Twigg P., Wilkes R.A., Buckley J.G. Functional outcome folowing bone transport reconstruction of distal tibial defects. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. 2005; 87: 145–152.
 
29.
Perttunen J.R., Anttila E., Södergård J., Merikanto J., Komil P.V. Gait asymmetry in patients with limb length discrepancy. Scand J. Med. Sci. Sports 2004; 14: 49–56.
 
30.
Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and patological function. Slack 1992.
 
31.
Schuler N.B., Bey M.J., Shearn J.T., Butler D.L. Evaluation of an electromagnetic position tracking device for measuring in vivo, dynamic joint kinematics. J. Biomech. 2007; 38: 2113–2117.
 
32.
Milis P., Morrison S., Lloyd D.G., Barrett R.S. Repeatability of 3D gait kinematics obtained from an electromagnetic tracking system during treadmill locomotion. J. Biomech. 2007; 40(7): 1504–1511.
 
eISSN:1734-025X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top