Management of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy – current standards of care
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Walczak
Katedra i Klinika Chirurgii Klatki Piersiowej, SPSK Nr 1 im. prof. S. Szyszko ŚUM, ul. 3 Maja 13/15, 41-800 Zabrze
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2025;79:361-367
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Anastomotic leak (AL) is the most serious early complication after esophagectomy and significantly impacts treatment outcomes. The aim of this study is to review the current principles of diagnosis and management of AL using standardized definitions and classifications and the “step-up” approach. The key factors in diagnosis are a high index of clinical suspicion, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen with oral water contrast as the first-choice examination and early endoscopy, which combines a diagnostic role with the possibility of immediate therapy. The “step-up” approach involves rapid control of sepsis and source of infection (radiologic or surgical drainage), gastrointestinal decompression (nil per os), targeted antibiotic therapy and preferably enteral nutrition, with escalation to endoscopic treatment. Depending on the local findings, covered self-expanding metal stents or self-expanding plastic stents, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), and – in selected situations – endoscopic internal drainage are used. In cases of extensive tissue damage, conduit necrosis, or failure of endoscopic therapy, surgical treatment may be required. Combined strategies (e.g. sequential EVT → stent) and hybrid solutions (stents with integrated vacuum systems) allow the therapy to be tailored to local conditions. Effective implementation of coordinated protocols in experienced centers, with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, is associated with a decrease in mortality and improved short- and long-term outcomes.
REFERENCES (33)
1.
Low D.E., Alderson D., Cecconello I., Chang A.C., Darling G.E., D’Journo X.B. et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann. Surg. 2015; 262(2): 286–294, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098.
2.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group, West Midlands Research Collaborative. Rates of anastomotic complications and their management following esophagectomy: results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA). Ann. Surg. 2022; 275(2): e382–e391, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004649.
3.
Goense L., Ruurda J.P., van Hillegersberg R. Recent advances in defining and benchmarking complications after esophagectomy. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019; 11(11): E243–E246, doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.12.
4.
Fransen L.F.C., Berkelmans G.H.K., Asti E., van Berge Henegouwen M.I., Berlth F., Bonavina L. et al. The effect of postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy on long-term survival: an international multicenter cohort study. Ann. Surg. 2021; 274(6): e1129–e1137, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003772.
5.
Ubels S., Klarenbeek B., Verstegen M., Bouwense S., Griffiths E.A., van Workum F. et al. Predicting mortality in patients with anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: development of a prediction model using data from the TENTACLE-Esophagus study. Dis. Esophagus 2023; 36(5): doac081, doi: 10.1093/dote/doac081.
6.
Schaible A., Schmidt T., Diener M., Hinz U., Sauer P., Wichmann D. et al. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection: Definition and validation of a new severity grading classification. [Article in German]. Chirurg 2018; 89(12): 945–951, doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0738-7.
7.
Koch O.O., Singhartinger F., Wallner E., Paireder M., Holzinger J., Längle F. et al. Austrian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus paper on the classification and treatment of anastomotic leaks after esophageal resections. Eur. Surg. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10353-025-00883-0.
8.
Spaander M.C.W., van der Bogt R.D., Baron T.H., Albers D., Blero D., de Ceglie A. et al. Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline – Update 2021. Endoscopy 2021; 53(7): 751–762, doi: 10.1055/a-1475-0063.
9.
Low D.E., Allum W., De Manzoni G., Ferri L., Immanuel A., Kuppusamy M.K. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J. Surg. 2019; 43(2): 299–330, doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4.
10.
Scognamiglio P., Reeh M., Karstens K., Bellon E., Kantowski M., Schön G. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus stenting for postoperative esophago-enteric anastomotic leakage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52(8): 632–642, doi: 10.1055/a-1149-1741.
11.
Jung D.H., Huh C.W., Min Y.W., Park J.C. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for the management of upper GI leaks and perforations: a multicenter retrospective study of factors associated with treatment failure (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2022; 95(2): 281–290, doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.018.
12.
Tavares G., Tustumi F., Tristão L.S., Bernardo W.M. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leak in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis. Esophagus 2021; 34(5): doaa132, doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa132.
13.
Rubicondo C., Lovece A., Pinelli D., Indriolo A., Lucianetti A., Colledan M. Endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (E-Vac) therapy for postoperative esophageal fistula: successful case series and literature review. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2020; 18(1): 301, doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02073-6.
14.
Triantafyllou A., Mela E., Theodoropoulos C., Theodorou E.P., Kitsou E., Saliaris K. et al. Addressing anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: insights from a specialized unit. J. Clin. Med. 2025; 14(11): 3694, doi: 10.3390/jcm14113694.
15.
Wilson M.K., Carr S.R. Clinical applications of esophageal stents. Ann. Esophagus 2023; 6: 18, doi: 10.21037/aoe-21-29.
16.
Bi Y., Wu Z., Yi M., Han X., Ren J. Three-tube method and covered metallic stent for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020; 20(1): 330, doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01480-z.
17.
Bernardi F., Dell’Anna G., Biamonte P., Barchi A., Fanti L., Malesci A. et al. Stents and emerging alternatives in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comprehensive review. Diagnostics 2025; 15(18): 2344, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15182344.
18.
Papaefthymiou A., Gkolfakis P., Basiliya K., Ramai D., Tziatzios G., Sehgal V. et al. Success rates of fixation techniques in prevention of esophageal stent migration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2024; 56(1): 22–30, doi: 10.1055/a-2147-8294.
19.
Schiemer M., Bettinger D., Mueller J., Schultheiss M., Schwacha H., Hasselblatt P. et al. Reduction of esophageal stent migration rate with a novel over-the-scope fixation device (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2022; 96(1): 1–8, doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.001.
20.
Park K.H., Lew D., Samaan J., Patel S., Liu Q., Gaddam S. et al. Comparison of no stent fixation, endoscopic suturing, and a novel over-the-scope clip for stent fixation in preventing migration of fully covered self-expanding metal stents: a retrospective comparative study (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2022; 96(5): 771–779, doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.001.
21.
Park J.Y., Song H.Y., Kim J.H., Park J.H., Na H.K., Kim Y.H. et al. Benign anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: long-term effectiveness of balloon dilation and factors affecting recurrence in 155 patients. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012; 198(5): 1208–1213, doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7608.
22.
Han S., Girotra M., Abdi M., Akshintala V.S., Chen D., Chen Y.I. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy. iGIE. 2024; 3(3): 333–341, doi: 10.1016/j.igie.2024.06.003.
23.
Bludau M., Fuchs H.F., Herbold T., Maus M.K.H., Alakus H., Popp F. et al. Results of endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure device for treatment of upper GI leaks. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32(4): 1906–1914, doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5883-4.
24.
Berlth F., Bludau M., Plum P.S., Herbold T., Christ H., Alakus H. et al. Self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic vacuum therapy in anastomotic leak treatment after oncologic gastroesophageal surgery. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2019; 23(1): 67–75, doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4000-x.
25.
Toh B.C., Chong J., Yeung B.P., Lim C.H., Lim E.K., Chan W.H. et al. Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? Clin. Endosc. 2022; 55(3): 401–407, doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.197.
26.
Lange J., Kähler G., Bernhardt J., Knievel J., Dormann A., Hügle U. et al. The VACStent trial: combined treatment of esophageal leaks by covered stent and endoscopic vacuum therapy. Surg. Endosc. 2023; 37(5): 3657–3668, doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09861-7.
27.
Lange J., Eisenberger C.F., Knievel J., Linderer A., Heiss M.M. Preemptive endoluminal vacuum therapy with the VACStent – a pilot study to reduce anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis hybrid esophagectomy. Front. Surg. 2023; 10: 1133083, doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133083.
28.
Pattynama L.M.D., Eshuis W.J., van Berge Henegouwen M.I., Bergman J.J.G.H.M., Pouw R.E. Vacuum-stent: A combination of endoscopic vacuum therapy and an intraluminal stent for treatment of esophageal transmural defects. Front. Surg. 2023; 10: 1145984, doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1145984.
29.
Kehagias D., Abogabal S., Lampropoulos C., Haider M.I., Kehagias I., Jain P. et al. VacStent as a novel therapeutic approach for esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks – a systematic review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1): 309, doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03067-5.
30.
Schaheen L., Blackmon S.H., Nason K.S. Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Am. J. Surg. 2014; 208(4): 536–543, doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.011.
31.
Gritsiuta A.I., Reep G., Parupudi S., Petrov R.V. Optimizing the management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy: a narrative review of salvage strategies and outcomes. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2025; 29(7): 102069, doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102069.
32.
Griffiths E.A.; Oesophago-Gastric Anastomotic Audit (OGAA) Collaborative; Writing Committee; Data Analysis; Steering Committee; National Leads; Site Leads; Collaborators. Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA). Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2024; 50(6): 107983, doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107983.
33.
Weber M.C., Jorek N., Neumann P.A., Bachmann J., Dimpel R., Martignoni M. et al. Incidence and treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy in German acute care hospitals: a retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Surg. 2025; 111(4): 2953–2961, doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002274.