Psychological gender among women involved in different forms of group physical activity
More details
Hide details
Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
Monika Grażyna Bąk-Sosnowska   

Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, ul. Medyków 12, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2018;72:128–133
Gender is a combination of psychological characteristics ascribed by culture to men or women. It is unrelated to biological sex but affects one’s experiences, reactions and behavior. The aim of the study was to compare the psychological gender of women involved in different forms of physical activity.

Material and methods:
We examined 112 adult women who have been practicing yoga (Group A) or other group activities (Group B) at least once monthly for at least 1 month. We used the Sex Role Inventory (SRI) and short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).

There were no statistically significant differences between Group A and Group B with regard to age, body mass, BMI, or duration of physical activity per week (p > 0.05). The mean IPAQ score was high in both groups (> 1500 MET); the difference between the groups was not significant (p > 0.05). The majority of subjects from Group A displayed feminine gender (57.14%) as measured by the SRI, followed by undetermined (28.57%), androgynous (10.71%), and masculine (3.57%). The majority of subjects from Group B exhibited androgynous (35.71%) gender, followed by undetermined (33.93%), masculine (23.21%), and feminine (7.14%). The differences between the groups were significant in that regard (p < 0.001). No relationship between the results of the SRI and IPAQ questionnaire was noted (p > 0.05).

Women practicing yoga differ with respect to the type of psychological gender from women involved in other physical activities. Feminine gender dominates in the first group, while androgynous is most common in the latter.

Bem S.L., Martyna W., Watson C. Sex typing and androgyny: further explorations of the expressive domain. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1976; 34(5): 1016–1023, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.1016.
Bem S.L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol. Rev. 1981; 88(4): 354–364, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
Bussey K., Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychol. Rev. 1999; 106(4): 676–713, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.
DiDonato M.D., Berenbaum S.A. Predictors and Consequences of Gender Typicality: The Mediating Role of Communality. Arch. Sex Behav. 2013; 42(3): 429–436, doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9955-1.
Cook E.P. Psychological Androgyny. A Review of the Research. Counsel. Psychol. 1987; 15(3): 471–513, doi: 10.1177/0011000087153006.
Chalabaev A., Sarrazin P., Fontayne, P. Stereotype endorsement and perceived ability as mediators of the girls’ gender orientation – soccer performance relationship. Psychol. Sport Exercise 2009; 10(2): 297–299, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.08.002.
Fredricks J.A., Eccles J.S. Family socialization, gender, and sport motivation and involvement. J. Sport Exercise Psychol. 2005; 27(1): 3–31, doi: 10.1123/jsep.27.1.3.
Łuszczyńska A. Psychology of sport and physical activity. Clinical issues [in Polish]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Warszawa 2011.
Dreger A. Sex Typing for Sport. Hastings Cent. Rep. 2010; 40(2): 22–24, doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0250.
Burdzicka-Wołowik J. Psychological gender of women taking up typically masculine sports activity. Biom. Hum. Kinetics 2012: 4(1): 24–28, doi: 10.2478/v10101-012-0005-1.
Chalabaev A., Sarrazin P., Fontayne P., Boiche J., Clement-Guillotin C. The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and excercise: Review and future directions. Psychol. Sport Exercise 2013; 14(2): 136–144, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.005.
Gerek Z. Comparison of communal sex roles of female sports students studying in different universities in Turkey. Educ. Res. Rev. 2015; 10(5): 541–546.
Owen N., Sparling P.B., Healy G.N., Dunstan D.W., Matthews C.E. Sedentary behavior: emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin. Proceed. 2010; 85(12): 1138–1141, doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0444.
Biernat E., Stupnicki R., Gajewski A. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – Polish version. Phys. Educ. Sport 2007; 51(1): 47.
Kuczyńska A. Inwentarz do oceny płci psychologicznej IPP. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP, 2012.
Ross A., Friedmann E., Bevans M., Thomas S. National survey of yoga practitioners: mental and physical health benefits. Complement. Ther. Med. 2013; 21(4): 313–323, doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.04.001.
Szmajke A., Adamczuk A. Self-esteem, the level of aggressiveness and gender identity [in Polish]. Trening 1993; 20(4): 117–126.
Soroka A., Bergier J. Sense of gender identity in women practicing football with consideration of the formation. Pol. J. Sport Tour. 2011; 18(1): 45–51, doi: 10.2478/v10197-011-0004-8.
Pacut A. Poczucie tożsamości płciowej kobiet a uprawiana przez nie dyscyplina sportu. Sport Wyczynowy 2006; 3–4: 36–39.
Starzomska M., Kowalczyk A. Psychological sex of athletes based on the results of one’s own research. Fides et Ratio 2012; 12(4): 127–139.