PL EN
 
4/2009 vol. 63
Get citation
Activation energy of viscous flow for some globular and non-globular proteins obtained from viscosity measurements and modified Arrhenius equation
Karol Monkos 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Biophysics, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Karol Monkos   

Katedra i Zakład Biofizyki SUM, 41-808 Zabrze 8, ul. H. Jordana 19; tel. 32 272 20 41 /236, fax 32 272 01 42
 
 
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2009;63:27-38
 
Article (PDF)
References (53)
 
KEYWORDS
activation energy
viscosity
bovine β-lactoglobulin
lysozyme
immunoglobulin IgG
 
ABSTRACT
Background:
The aim of the present paper was investigation of the temperature dependence of the activation energy of viscous flow for some proteins in aqueous solutions.

Material and Methods:
The viscosity of hen egg-white lysozyme, bovine β-lactoglobulin, and human, bovine and porcine IgG immunoglobulin aqueous solutions was measured at temperatures ranging from 5oC to 55oC and in a wide range of concentrations. The measurements were performed with an Ubbelohdetype capillary microviscometer.

Results:
The average value of the activation energy of viscous flow ΔE can be experimentally obtained from the slope of the line that represents the dependence of the liquid viscosity η (in logarithmic scale) versus a reciprocal of the absolute temperature (T-1). The functional dependence of ΔE on temperature can be obtained from strict definition ΔE = R[dlnη/d(T-1)], where R is the gas constant and from a three parameters modified Arrhenius formula which gives an analytical function describing the viscosity-temperature dependence for proteins solutions in a wide range of temperatures. As appears, ΔE obtained in such a way decreases with increasing temperature according to a square function. The parameters of this function have been obtained for all studied proteins.

Conclusions:
The obtained results show that square function describes the temperature dependence of ΔE both for water, solutions and proteins themselves. One of the main factor which influence the activation energy is a molecular mass of protein. However, the results obtained for the studied immunoglobulins IgG show that this factor is not the only one.

 
REFERENCES (53)
1.
Squire P.G., Himmel M.E. Hydrodynamics and protein hydration. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1979; 196: 165-177.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Smith L.J., Sutcliff e M.J., Redfield C., Dobson C.M. Structure of hen lysozyme in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 229: 930-944.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Monkos K. Concentration and temperature dependence of viscosity in lysozyme aqueous solutions. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1997; 1339: 304-310.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Blanch E.W., Morozowa-Roche L.A., Hecht L., Noppe W., Barron L.D. Raman optical activity characterization of native and molten globule states of equine lysozyme: comparison with hen lysozyme and bovine α-lactalbumin. Biopolymers 2000; 57: 235-248.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Smyth E., Syme C.D., Blanch E.W., Hecht L., Vasak M., Barron L.D. Solution structure of native proteins with irregular folds from Raman optical activity. Biopolymers 2001; 58: 138-151.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Yokoyama K., Kamei T., Minami H., Suzuki M. Hydration study of globular proteins by microwave dielectric spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001; 105: 12622- 12627.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Oreccini A., Paciaroni A., Bizzarri A.R., Cannistraro S. Low-frequency vibrational anomalies in β-lactoglobulin: contribution of different hydrogen classes reveiled by inelastic neutron scattering. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001; 105: 12150-12156.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Kuwata K., Li H., Yamada H., Batt C.A., Goto Y., Akasaka K. High pressure NMR reveals a variety of fluctuating conformers in β-lactoglobulin. J. Mol. Biol. 2001; 305: 1073-1083.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Kuwata K., Hoshino M., Era S., Batt C.A., Goto Y. α → β transition of β-lactoglobulin as evidenced by heteronuclear NMR. J. Mol. Biol. 1998; 283: 731-739.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Kuwajima K., Yamaya H., Sugai S. The burst-phase intermediate in the refolding of β-lactoglobulin studied by stoppedfl ow circular dichroism and absorption spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 1996; 264: 806-822.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Relkin P. Reversibility of heat-induced sol-gel state transition. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1998; 22: 59-66.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Fessas D., Iametti S., Schiraldi A., Bonomi F. Thermal unfolding of monomeric and dimeric β-lactoglobulins. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001; 268: 5439-5448.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Rogers S.S., Venema P., van der Ploeg J.P.M., van der Linden E., Sagis L.M.C., Donald A.M. Investigating the permanent electric dipole moment of β-lactoglobulin fi brils, using transient electric birefringence. Biopolymers 2006; 82: 241-252.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Monkos K. On the hydrodynamics of gimeric bovine 14. Monkos K. On the hydrodynamics of gimeric bovine β-lactoglobulin solutions from viscometry approach. Polish J. Environm. Stud. 2006; 15: 88-90.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Monkos K. Analysis of the viscositytemperature- concentration dependence for dimeric bovine β-lactoglobulin aqueous solutions on the basis of the Vogel-Tammann- Fulcher’s equation. Curr. Top. Biophys. 2008; 31: 16-24.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Goodman J.W. Immunoglobulin structure and function, in: Stites D.P., Terr A.I. (Eds.), Basic and clinical immunology. 1991; Prentice Hall, pp. 109-121.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Al-Lazikani B., Lesk A.M., Chothia C. Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 1997; 273: 927-948.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Saphire E.O., Stanfi eld R.L., Crispin M.D.M., Parren P.W.H.I., Rudd P.M., Dwek R.A., Burton D.R., Wilson I.A. Contrasting IgG structures reveal extreme asymmetry and flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 2002; 319: 9-18.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Garcia de la Torre J. Hydrodynamics of segmentally fl exible macromolecules. Eur. Biophys. J. 1994; 23: 307-322.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Diaz F.G., Iniesta A., Garcia de la Torre J. Hydrodynamic study of fl exibility in immunoglobulin IgG1 using Brownian dynamics and the Monte Carlo simulations of a simple model. Biopolymers 1990; 30: 547-554.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Perkins S.J., Ashton A.W., Boehm M.K., Chamberlain D. Molecular structures from low angle X-ray and neutron scattering studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1998; 22: 1-16.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Monkos K., Turczynski B. A comparative study on viscosity of human, bovine and pig IgG immunoglobulins in aqueous solutions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1999; 26: 155-159.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Monkos K. A viscosity of the solution conformation and stiff ness of some IgG immunoglobulins. Polish J. Med. Phys. & Eng. 2001; 7: 47-52.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Young E.G. Occurrence, classifi cation, preparation and analysis of proteins, in: Florkin M., Stolz E.H. (Eds.), Comprehensive biochemistry. 1963; Amsterdam, pp. 22.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Roth S., Murray B.S., Dickinson E. Interfacial shear rheology of aged and heattreated β-lactoglobulin films: Displacement by nonionic surfactant. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000; 48: 1491-1497.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Yoshioka S., Aso Y., Kojima S. Softening temperature of lyophilized bovine serum albumin and ɣ-globulin as measured by spin-spin relaxation time of protein protons. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997; 86: 470-474.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Aymard P., Durand D., Nicolai T. The eff ect of temperature and ionic strength on the dimerisation of β-lactoglobulin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1996; 19: 213-221.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Lopez da Silva J.A., Gonçalves M.P., Rao M.A. Infl uence of temperature on the dynamics and steady-shear rheology of pectin dispersions. Carbohydr. Polym. 1994; 23: 77-87.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Jauregui B., Muńoz M.E., Santamaria A. Rheology of hydroxyethylated starch aqueous systems. Analysis of gel formation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995; 17: 49-54.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
de Paula R.C.M., Rodrigues J.F. Composition and rheological properties of cashew tree gum, the exudates polysaccharide from. Anacardium occidentale L. Carbohydr. Polym. 1995; 26: 177-181.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Kar F., Arslan N. Eff ect of temperature and concentration on viscosity of orange peel pectin solutions and intrinsic viscosity – molecular weight relationship. Carbohydr. Polym. 1999; 40: 277-284.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
de Vasconcelos C.L., de Azevedo F.G., Pereira M.R., Fonseca J.L.C. Viscosity-temperature-concentration relationship for starch-DMSO-water solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000; 41: 181-184.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Desbrieres J. Viscosity of semifl exible chitosan solutions: Infl uence of concentration, temperature, and role of intermolecular interactions. Biomacromolecules 2002; 3: 342-349.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Durand A. Aqueous solutions of amphiphilic polysaccharides: Concentration and temperature eff ect on viscosity. Eur. Polym. J. 2007; 43: 1744-1753.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Tiff any J.M., Koretz J.F. Viscosity of alpha-crystallin solutions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2002; 30: 179-185.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Knoben W., Besseling N.A.M., Cohen Stuart M.A. Rheology of a reversible supramolecular polymer studied by comparison of the eff ects of temperature and chain stoppers. J. Chem. Phys. 2007; 126: 024907.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Gun’ko V.M., Goncharuk E.V., Nechypor O.V., Pakhovchishin S.V., Turov V.V. Integral equation for calculation of distribution function of activation energy of shear viscosity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006; 304: 239-245.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Hayakawa E., Furuya K., Kuroda T., Moriyama M., Kondo A. Viscosity study on the self-association of doxorubicin in aqueous solution. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991; 39: 1282-1286.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Bourret E., Ratsimbazafy V., Maury L., Brossard C. Rheological behavior of saturated polyglycolysed glycerides. J. Pharm. Pharmcol. 1994; 46: 538-541.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Kamimura Y., Kurumada K., Asaba K., Ban-no H., Kambara H., Hiro M. Evaluation of activation energy of viscous flow of solgel derived phenyl-modifi ed silica Glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006; 352: 3175-3178.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Magerramov M.A., Abdulagatov A.I., Azizov N.D., Abulagatov I.M. Eff ect of temperature, concentration, and pressure on the viscosity of pomegranate and pear juice concentrates. J. Food Engn. 2007; 80: 476-489.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Vinogradov G.V., Malkin A.Ya. Rheology of polymers. 1980, Mir, Moscow.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Monkos K. Viscosity of bovine serum albumin aqueous solutions as a function of temperature and concentration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1996; 18: 61-68.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Monkos K. Concentration and temperature dependence of viscosity in lysozyme aqueous solutions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1997; 1339: 304-310.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Monkos K. Viscosity analysis of the temperature dependence of the solution conformation of ovalbumin. Biophys. Chem. 2000; 85: 7-16.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Monkos K. On the hydrodynamics and temperature dependence of the solution conformation of human serum albumin from viscometry approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004; 1700: 27-34.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Monkos K. A comparison of solution conformation and hydrodynamic properties of equine, porcine and rabbit serum albumin using viscometric measurements. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005; 1748: 100-109.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Zimmerman S.B., Minton A.P. Macromolecular crowding: biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1993; 22: 27-65.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Yokoyama K., Kamei T., Minami H., Suzuki M. Hydration study of globular proteins by microwave dielectric spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001; 105: 12622-12627.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Kabir S.R., Yokoyama K., Mishashi K., Kodama T. Suzuki M. Hyper-mobile water is induced around actin fi laments. Biophys. J. 2003; 85: 3154-3161.
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Harding S.E. The hydration problem in solution biophysics: an introduction. Biophys. Chem. 2001; 93: 87-91.
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Pérez J., Zanotti J-M., Durand D. Evolution of the internal Dynamics of two globular proteins from dry powder to solution. Biophys. J. 1999; 77: 454-469.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Monkos K. Temperature dependence of the activation energy of viscous flow for ovalbumin in aqueous solutions. Curr. Top. Biophys. 2007; 30: 29-33.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Porównanie współczynnika dyfuzji translacyjnej dla albumin surowicy kilku ssaków
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1734-025X
Journals System - logo


© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top