Limitations of electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy in differentiation between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis and Fabry disease
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Mateusz Tometczak   

Klinika Kardiologii, Górnośląskie Centrum Medyczne im. prof. Leszka Gieca Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach, ul. Ziołowa 45/47, 40-635 Katowice
 
 
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2024;78:173-178
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a common pathology and should be differentiated using non-invasive and invasive methods. Electrocardiography (ECG) is the first choice method for the clinical evaluation of patients with LVH.

Material and methods:
A retrospective analysis of 77 patients (pts; age: 54.1 ± 16.3; 50.6% men) with features of cardiac hypertrophy in an echocardiographic examination was performed. The population was divided into three subgroups: 60 pts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 11 pts with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and 6 pts with Fabry disease (FD). Multiple ECG records were evaluated and the presence and frequency of eight different LVH criteria were verified.

Results:
Among the study population LVH criteria were present in 67.6% pts with HCM, 53.8% pts with CA and 57.1% pts with FD. Analysis of the number of LVH ECG criteria revealed: none of LVH ECG criteria: in 32.4% pts of HCM, in 46.2% pts with CA, in 42.9% pts with FD; 1 LVH ECG criterion in 21.1% pts with HCM, 46.2% pts with CA and 14.3% pts with FD; 2–4 criteria in 33.8% pts with HCM, 7.7% pts with CA and 42.9% pts with FD; 5–7 criteria in 12.7% pts with HCM and no pts with CA or FD. No patient fulfilled the eight LVH ECG criteria.

Conclusions:
Electrocardiographic LVH criteria are not sensitive indicators of LVH. The mismatch between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and ECG findings is characteristic for CA and FD that may raise the suspicion of these diseases. The lack of LVH ECG criteria do not exclude these diagnoses.

 
REFERENCES (13)
1.
Lin X., Liang H.Y., Pinheiro A., Dimaano V., Sorensen L., Aon M. et al. Electromechanical relationship in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2013; 6(4): 604–615, doi: 10.1007/s12265-013-9481-0.
 
2.
Arbelo E., Protonotarios A., Gimeno J.R., Arbustini E., Barriales-Villa R., Basso C. et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies: Developed by the task force on the management of cardiomyopathies of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2023; 44(37): 3503–3626, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194.
 
3.
Sharma S., Labib S.B., Shah S.P. Electrocardiogram criteria to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis in men with a bundle branch block. Am. J. Cardiol. 2021; 146: 89–94, doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.01.026.
 
4.
Namdar M. Electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmia in Fabry disease. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2016; 3: 7, doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00007.
 
5.
Estes E.H. Jr, Jackson K.P. The electrocardiogram in left ventricular hypertrophy: past and future. J. Electrocardiol. 2009; 42(6): 589–592, doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.06.016.
 
6.
Namdar M., Steffel J., Jetzer S., Schmied C., Hürlimann D., Camici G.G. et al. Value of electrocardiogram in the differentiation of hypertensive heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis, amyloidosis, and Fabry disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012; 109(4): 587–593, doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.052.
 
7.
Yilmaz A., Bauersachs J., Bengel F., Büchel R., Kindermann I., Klingel K. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: position statement of the German Cardiac Society (DGK). Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2021; 110(4): 479–506, doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01799-3.
 
8.
Huang J., Zhao S., Chen Z., Zhang S., Lu M. Contribution of electrocardiogram in the differentiation of cardiac amyloidosis and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Int. Heart J. 2015; 56(5): 522–526, doi: 10.1536/ihj.15-005.
 
9.
Hoigné P., Attenhofer Jost C.H., Duru F., Oechslin E.N., Seifert B., Widmer U. et al. Simple criteria for differentiation of Fabry disease from amyloid heart disease and other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2006; 111(3): 413–422, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.08.023.
 
10.
Beer G., Reinecke P., Gabbert H.E., Hort W., Kuhn H. Fabry disease in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Z. Kardiol. 2002; 91(12): 992–1002, doi: 10.1007/s00392-002-0870-7.
 
11.
Junqua N., Legallois D., Segard S., Lairez O., Réant P., Goizet C. et al. The value of electrocardiography and echocardiography in distinguishing Fabry disease from sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020; 113(8–9): 542–550, doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.04.008.
 
12.
Vitale G., Ditaranto R., Graziani F., Tanini I., Camporeale A., Lillo R. et al. Standard ECG for differential diagnosis between Anderson-Fabry disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart 2022; 108(1): 54–60, doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318271.
 
13.
Granstam S.O., Rosengren S., Vedin O., Kero T., Sörensen J., Carlson K. et al. Evaluation of patients with cardiac amyloidosis using echocardiography, ECG and right heart catheterization. Amyloid 2013; 20(1): 27–33, doi: 10.3109/13506129.2012.761967.
 
eISSN:1734-025X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top