Endoscopic and classic comparison for the great saphenous vein used as a material for the coronary artery for patients with the risk of post-operative infection
Karol Froń 1  
 
More details
Hide details
1
Śląskie Centrum Chorób Serca, Zabrze
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Karol Froń   

Śląskie Centrum Chorób Serca, Zabrze, ul. Grzybowska 27/16, 41-800 Zabrze
 
Ann. Acad. Med. Siles. 2020;74:149–156
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
In modern cardiac surgery there are increasingly more minimally invasive techniques. One of them is the endoscopic harvesting of the SV during coronary operations.

AIM:
The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of endoscopic GSV harvesting, and the impact of this method on the quality of the harvested vessel.

Material and Methods:
In July 2016, in the Silesian Centre for Heart Disease, 136 patients underwent cardiac surgery. In 66 patients a coronary procedure was performed using the saphenous vein. Patients in the medium or high risk group of post-operative infection according to the BHIS scale were divided into two groups, 10 patients each. In one group, the great saphenous vein was harvested using the endoscopic method, in the other the classical method. Intraoperatively, the quality of the vessel and flow in the bypasses were evaluated. The local area of wound healing of the lower limb wound was also evaluated and compared, which was then compared between the groups.

Results:
The procedures, all the harvested vessels were used for coronary artery bypass grafting. In the intraoperative assessment, no microscopic vascular damage was detected. Doppler examination of the endoscopic vessel flow showed patency of the graft with good blood flow and a low pulsation index. In the postoperative observation, no complications related to wound healing were found.

Conclusions:
The endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting technique is a method as safe as classical methods, but it provides a better wound healing effect and significantly improves the cosmetic effect of the operated limb.

 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Zenati M.A., Gaziano J. M., Collins J.F., Biswas K., Gabany J.M., Quin J.A., Bitondo J.M., Bakaeen F.G., Kelly R.F., Shroyer A.L., Bhatt D.L. Choice of Vein-Harvest Technique for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Rationale and Design of the REGROUP Trial. Clin Cardiol. 2014; 37(6): 325–330, doi: 10.1002/clc.22267.
 
2.
Kuan P., Bernstein S.B., Ellestad M.H. Coronary artery bypass surgery morbidity. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1984; 3(6): 1391–1397, doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80276-4.
 
3.
van Diepen S., Brennan J.M., Hafley G.E., Reyes E.M, Allen K.B., Ferguson T.B., Peterson E.D., Williams J.B., Gibson C.M., Mack M.J., Kouchoukos N.T., Alexander J.H., Lopes R.D. Endoscopic Harvesting Device Type and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing CoronaryArtery Bypass Surgery. Ann. Surg. 2013. Raja S.G., Sarang Z. Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns & controversies. J. Thorac Dis. 2013; 5(Suppl 6): S630–S637, doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.10.01.
 
4.
Lineaweaver W. Vein-graft harvesting technique in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2012; 308(17): 1739, doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14015.
 
5.
Bisleri G., Moggi A., Muneretto C. Endoscopic vessel harvesting: good or bad. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2013; 28(6): 666–670, doi: 10.1097 HCO.0b013e3283658776.
 
6.
Shahzad G.R., Melissa R., Jarman J.W. Brompton Harefield Infection Score (BHIS): Development and validation of a stratification tool for predicting risk of surgical site infection after coronary artery bypass grafting. Int. J. Surg. 2015; 16(PtA): 69–73, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.008.
 
7.
Gurkan S., Gur O., Yuksel V., Tastekin E., Huseyin S., Gur D.O., Canbaz S. The efect of distension pressure on endothelial injury and vasodilatation response in saphenous vein grafts: conversion of a bypass graft to a dead pipe. Kardiochir. Torakochir. Pol. 2014; 11(2): 119–125, doi: 10.5114/kitp.2014.43836.
 
8.
Andreas M., Wiedemann D., Stasek S., Kampf S., Ehrlich M., Eigenbauer E., Laufer G., Kocher A. Endoscopic vein harvesting is influenced by patient-related risk factors and may be of specific benefit in female patients. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2013; 17(4): 603–607, doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt224.
 
9.
Deppe A.C., Liakopoulos O.J., Choi Y.H., Slottosch I., Kuhn E.W., Scherner M., Stange S., Wahlers T. Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 27,789 patients. J. Surg. Res. 2013; 180(1): 114–124, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.013.
 
10.
Namthaisong K., Kasemsan C. Endoscopic conduit harvesting and conventional conduit harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2012; 95 (Suppl. 8): S58−S63.
 
11.
Hrapkowicz T., Bisleri G., Wojarski J., Nożyński J., Farmas A., Styn T., Zych B., Zembala M. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting as a material in coronary artery bypass grafting in 15 patients. Kardiochir. Torakochir. Pol. 2006; 3(2): 149–153.
 
12.
Talbot T.R. Diabetes mellitus and cardiothoracic surgical site infections, Am. J. Infect. Control. 2005; 33(6): 353–359, doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.10.008.
 
 
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Learning process and results in endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting technique
Tuncay ERDEN, Yıldırım GÜLTEKİN
Journal of Surgery and Medicine
 
eISSN:1734-025X