PL EN
Rycina z artykułu: A survey of medical...
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Introduction:
This study aims to assess medical students’ awareness and opinions regarding body donation for anatomy education and research, including concerns about donation and personal considerations for donating one’s body.

Material and methods:
The anonymous survey, comprising 20 questions, was completed by 528 medical students from across Poland (366 females and 162 males). Participation in the study was voluntary. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine statistical distribution in the analyzed respondents. The chi-square test was used to compare demographic groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results:
35.4% of respondents consider donating their bodies for scientific and educational purposes. More atheists wanted to donate the organs after death than Catholics (p = 0.03). The year of study and placeof residence do not influence the willingness to donate the body for scientific purposes (p = 0.55 and p = 0.23), but females were more willing to donate the organs after death than males (p = 0.002). The willingness to donate body before medical studies affected the willingness to donate body during medical studies (p < 0.001). The lack of respect from students towards cadavers is the main concern regarding body donation (42.4%). 93.9% respondents think that it is not possible to teach the anatomy without the access to a human body.

Conclusions:
Participation in dissection room classes increases students’ willingness to donate their own bodies. The primary barrier remains the fear of disrespect toward the cadaver. Since learning about the donor’s life story fosters respect, we recommend transitioning from anonymous approach to cadavers toward personalizing donor information and student participation in memorial ceremonies.
REFERENCJE (38)
1.
O’Malley CD. Andreas Vesalius of Brussels 1514–1564. University of California Press. Berkeley and Los Angeles 1964.
 
2.
Boduç E, Allahverdi TD. Medical Students’ Views on Cadaver and Organ Donation. Transplant Proc. 2022;54(8):2057–2062. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.021.
 
3.
Barcik J, Pilarz Ł. Wykorzystanie zwłok i szczątków ludzkich przez studentów do celów dydaktycznych a przestępstwo znieważenia zwłok z art. 262 § 1 k.k. Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 2016;20(4):87–105.
 
4.
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–559. doi: 10.1002/ase.1696.
 
5.
Saverino D. Teaching anatomy at the time of COVID-19. Clin Anat. 2021;34(8):1128. doi: 10.1002/ca.23616.
 
6.
Wright SJ. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(3):146–157. doi: 10.1002/ase.1265.
 
7.
Maani A, Forma A, Brachet A, Czarnek K, Alashkham A, Baj J. The future of morphological science education: Learning and teaching anatomy in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(7):5367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075367.
 
8.
Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P. Cadaverless anatomy: Darkness in the times of pandemic Covid-19. Morphologie. 2020;104(346):147–150. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2020.05.003.
 
9.
Harmon DJ, Attardi SM, Barremkala M, Bentley DC, Brown KM, Dennis JF, et al. An analysis of anatomy education before and during Covid‐19: May–August 2020. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(2):132–147. doi: 10.1002/ase.2051.
 
10.
Patra A, Asghar A, Chaudhary P, Ravi KS. Integration of innovative educational technologies in anatomy teaching: new normal in anatomy education. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44(1):25–32. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02868-6.
 
11.
Bajor G, Likus W, Kuszewski P, Kostro K, Łoś A, Kłakus P. “Mortui vivos docent” or who gives his body to science? The analysis of the personal questionnaires of Polish donors in the Conscious Body Donation Program. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121061.
 
12.
Asante EA, Maalman RS, Ali MA, Donkor YO, Korpisah JK. Perception and Attitude of Medical Students towards Cadaveric Dissection in Anatomical Science Education. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021;31(4):867–874. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.22.
 
13.
Bharambe VK, Prasad A, Bokan R, Kalthur S, Manvikar P, Puranam V. The anatomist’s perspective today towards human body donation for procurement of cadavers for study of human anatomy. Electron J Gen Med. 2023;20(3):em480. doi: 10.29333/ejgm/13054.
 
14.
Sheikh AH, Barry DS, Gutierrez H, Cryan JF, O’Keeffe GW. Cadaveric anatomy in the future of medical education: What is the surgeons view? Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(2):203–208. doi: 10.1002/ase.1560.
 
15.
Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(2):173–180. doi: 10.1007/s00276-007-0180-x.
 
16.
Saha A, Sarkar A, Mandal S. Body Donation after Death: The Mental Setup of Educated People. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(6):AC05–AC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12246.6011.
 
17.
Singh P, Phuyal N, Khadka S, Gurung M. Knowledge of Medical Students and Faculties of a Medical College Towards Human Body and Organ Donation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021;59(234):141–145. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6200.
 
18.
Ebeye OA, Ojebor C, Ade A. Perception to organ and corpse donation among students of basic medical sciences. Int J Forensic Med Invest. 2016;2(1):8–12.
 
19.
Srdić Galić B, Drvendžija Z, Štrkalj G. Attitudes of medical and allied medical students from Serbia toward whole body donation. Biosci J. 2016;32(5):1388–1402. doi: 10.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-34414.
 
20.
Mwachaka PM, Mandela P, Saidi H. Repeated Exposure to Dissection Does Not Influence Students’ Attitudes towards Human Body Donation for Anatomy Teaching. Anat Res Int. 2016;2016:9251049. doi: 10.1155/2016/9251049.
 
21.
Perry GF, Ettarh RR. Age modulates attitudes to whole body donation among medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(4):167–172. doi: 10.1002/ase.86.
 
22.
Abbasi Asl J, Nikzad H, Taherian A, Atlasi MA, Naderian H, Mousavi G, et al. Cultural acceptability and personal willingness of Iranian students toward cadaveric donation. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(2):120–126. doi: 10.1002/ase.1634.
 
23.
Quiroga-Garza A, Reyes-Hernández CG, Zarate-Garza PP, Esparza-Hernández CN, Gutierrez-de la O J, de la Fuente-Villarreal, et al. Willingness toward organ and body donation among anatomy professors and students in Mexico. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):589–597. doi: 10.1002/ase.1705.
 
24.
Cahill KC, Ettarh RR. Student attitudes to whole body donation are influenced by dissection. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(5):212–216. doi: 10.1002/ase.42.
 
25.
Bahşi İ, Topal Z, Çetkin M, Orhan M, Kervancıoğlu P, Odabaşıoğlu ME, et al. Evaluation of attitudes and opinions of medical faculty students against the use of cadaver in anatomy education and investigation of the factors affecting their emotional responses related thereto. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43(4):481–487. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02567-8.
 
26.
Anyanwu EG, Obikili EN, Agu AU. The dissection room experience: A factor in the choice of organ and whole body donation--a Nigerian survey. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(1):56–63. doi: 10.1002/ase.1370.
 
27.
Likus W, Janiszewska P. Would you donate your body? Attitudes of students of nursing and physiotherapy towards body donation for educational and scientific purposes. Folia Morphol. 2023;82(4):921–931. doi: 10.5603/fm.a2023.0025.
 
28.
Chu SY, Tseng TC, Ho YC, Tseng GF. The Impact of a Gross Anatomy Curriculum With Donor Family Interaction: Thematic Analysis of Student Letters to Silent Mentors. Acad Med. 2022;97(7):1065–1070. doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004678.
 
29.
da Rocha AO, Maués JL, Chies GAF, da Silva AP. Assessing the Impact of a Ceremony in Honor of the Body Donors in the Development of Ethical and Humanistic Attitudes among Medical Students. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):467–474. doi: 10.1002/ase.1920.
 
30.
El-Haddad J, Prvan T, Štrkalj G. Attitudes of Anatomy Students toward Commemorations for Body Donors: A Multicultural Perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(1):89–98. doi: 10.1002/ase.1994.
 
31.
Hasselblatt F, Messerer DAC, Keis O, Böckers TM, Böckers A. Anonymous body or first patient? A status report and needs assessment regarding the personalization of donors in dissection courses in German, Austrian, and Swiss Medical Schools. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(3):282–293. doi: 10.1002/ase.1744.
 
32.
Arráez-Aybar LA, Bueno-López JL, Moxham BJ. Anatomists’ views on human body dissection and donation: an international survey. Ann Anat. 2014;196(6):376–386. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2014.06.004.
 
33.
Ciliberti R, Gulino M, Gazzaniga V, Gallo F, Vellone VG, De Stefano F, et al. A Survey on the Knowledge and Attitudes of Italian Medical Students toward Body Donation: Ethical and Scientific Considerations. J Clin Med. 2018;7(7):168. doi: 10.3390/jcm7070168.
 
34.
De Gama BZ, Bhengu TT, Satyapal KS. Attitudes of Undergraduate South African Students towards Body Donation. Int J Morphol. 2018;36(1):130–134.
 
35.
Jenkin RA, Garrett SA, Keay KA. Altruism in death: Attitudes to body and organ donation in Australian students. Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(1):27–46. doi: 10.1002/ase.2180.
 
36.
Kostorrizos A, Koukakis A, Samolis A, Protogerou V, Mariolis-Sapsakos T, Piagkou M, et al. Body donation for research and teaching purposes: the contribution of blood donation units in the progress of anatomical science. Folia Morphol. 2019;78(3):575–581. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0103.
 
37.
Alexander M, Marten M, Stewart E, Serafin S, Štrkalj G. Attitudes of Australian chiropractic students toward whole body donation: a cross-sectional study. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(2):117–123. doi: 10.1002/ase.1390.
 
38.
Bolt S, Venbrux E, Eisinga R, Gerrits PO. Anatomist on the dissecting table? Dutch anatomical professionals’ views on body donation. Clin Anat. 2012;25(2):168–175. doi: 10.1002/ca.21215.
 
eISSN:1734-025X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top